Side by side
Citradar vs getcitedmore
Plans read from both vendors' own pricing pages, with the same seats and billing applied to each. getcitedmore is a verified alternative to Citradar: it does the same main job for a similar customer.
Citradar is a platform that tracks how AI assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity mention, rank, and cite your brand compared to competitors. It provides insights such as AI visibility score, competitor ranking, source and citation analysis, and platform and topic breakdowns, all automated and updated daily.
- Starting price
- From $49/mo
- Price clarity
- Price clarity grade C, 62 out of 100 62 of 100
- Category
- SEO & visibility
- Platforms
- Not confirmed
- Good fit for
- Brands wanting to monitor and improve how AI assistants mention and rank their brand compared to competitors.. Teams actively competing on AI visibility who need more tracked prompts and AI models coverage.
- Limitations
- Growth and Scale plans add Claude AI model tracking, but Starter plan does not include Claude.
CitedMore measures how often AI engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini name and cite your brand in response to buyer-intent questions. It provides a prioritized fix list showing where your brand is invisible, who wins instead, and which pages to target to improve visibility.
- Starting price
- Price not published
- Price clarity
- Not graded
- Category
- SEO & visibility
- Platforms
- Not confirmed
- Good fit for
- Businesses seeking data-driven insights on AI answer visibility without needing onboarding or installation.
- Limitations
- The audit depends on public website data to infer category, competitors, and buyer questions, which may limit accuracy if data is incomplete.. Single answers from language models are considered noise; multiple passes and large samples are required for reliable measurement.
What each one costs your team
THE COST FOR YOUR TEAM
Go beyond the starting price.
Published plan prices for your team size and usage. Results update as you type. Taxes, currency conversion and unlisted add-ons are excluded, and anything the source did not state is called out rather than guessed.
Known monthly subtotal
$49/month
1 of 2 tools could not be priced with these inputs, so this is not the full cost.
| Tool / plan | Monthly | Per year | What this assumes |
|---|---|---|---|
StarterCheapest fit Flat subscription | $49 | $588 | Automatically extracted from the linked pricing source. Seat allowances, usage limits, taxes and terms are not confirmed — check them with the provider. |
Growth Flat subscription | $99 | $1,188 | Automatically extracted from the linked pricing source. Seat allowances, usage limits, taxes and terms are not confirmed — check them with the provider. |
Scale Flat subscription | $199 | $2,388 | Automatically extracted from the linked pricing source. Seat allowances, usage limits, taxes and terms are not confirmed — check them with the provider. |
| No pricing recorded yet. Check the official site, or ask the owner to add it. | |||
Citradar
Best fit
Brands wanting to monitor and improve how AI assistants mention and rank their brand compared to competitors.; Teams actively competing on AI visibility who need more tracked prompts and AI models coverage.
Trade-offs
Growth and Scale plans add Claude AI model tracking, but Starter plan does not include Claude.
Integrations / export
Not confirmed
getcitedmore
Best fit
Businesses seeking data-driven insights on AI answer visibility without needing onboarding or installation.
Trade-offs
The audit depends on public website data to infer category, competitors, and buyer questions, which may limit accuracy if data is incomplete.; Single answers from language models are considered noise; multiple passes and large samples are required for reliable measurement.
Integrations / export
Not confirmed
More alternatives to Citradar →More alternatives to getcitedmore →Add a third tool